Well, I guess I saw this one coming. Remember in my original post about the SSRP, when I said that I didn't want to ruffle anyone's feathers? Umm, the feathers have been ruffled.
I received a very angry and, in my opinion, uncalled for email today from the creator of the GSRP. She has posted the email in its entirety on her site, if you'd like to read it. While I do not wish to get into a pecking match, I do feel like I have to clear up a few misunderstandings.
First of all, I tried my best to make it clear that much of what I said about the SSRP was meant to be tongue-in-cheek. I do not really consider myself a snob, and those who know me would agree. I like people and I like people to like me. Who doesn't? I don't want to make enemies. I just want to exchange some yarn.
Secondly, I am not the only person to be disappointed by the contents of a GSRP box. Perhaps I am the one who wrote the longest post about it, and certainly I am the only one who, to this point, has arranged an alternate exchange, but I am not alone in my disappointment.
I meant absolutely no disrespect to the GSRP or its creator. In fact, I tried to be tactful and humorous with my post when I could've just said, "I received a box full of crap in the mail today labelled 'Fair Isle Box.'" I acknowledge that there were two things in the box that I found somewhat appealing. My expectations, however, were that I would receive a box full of yarn and goodies so fabulous that I would have a hard time deciding what to take. The two things I might've taken out of the box I received were only semi-exciting to me. I suppose the problem here is with my expectations being too high.
If you read my original post about the Fair Isle box, I think most would agree that I was not disrespectful, hateful or nasty in what I wrote. I stated my opinion. I was disappointed. The fact is that the box came, and it was full of things I did not care for. And I can honestly say that most of the people I've met through the blog world, and my own real-life knitting friends would back me up on this one. I am not being unreasonable. It's very possible that I misunderstood the goal of the GSRP, and therefore had skewed expectations. Like I said in my original post about the FI box, I wasn't expecting a box full of Rowan and Noro to land in my lap, but on the other end of the spectrum, I wasn't expecting a box full of what did land in my lap!
No where in my post, or in my original email to the GSRP creator when I asked for guidance, did I blame her for my disappointment. And even now, I thank her for arranging such a huge project. The idea is a great one. The execution did not live up to the expectations. That was not her fault, and I never insinuated or stated that it was.
I also did not "write all previous contributors off as the knitting equivolent white trash. [sic]" No where did I call any of the participants names. I am not eight. I did state that some people seemed to have taken out disproportionately to what they put in. That is a fact.
Finally, there is nothing "secret" about my plan for the SSRP. I did not arrange a "secret society of those deemed worthy enough" to join. If I wanted to create a secret society, I would not announce it on my blog and have an open call for interest.
I don't want to get into a big to-do about this. My main point is that I did not mean to step on any toes. I did not mean to hurt any feelings. And I do not think I'm better than anyone. Except maybe George W.
Ooops... I think I hear more feathers being ruffled!
Edited to add: The Alpha version of the SSRP is full. Please email me if you're interested in joining the Beta version. It's the same deal, but it probably won't start up until late June, and will be capped at twenty people. And, I've set up a special email address for the Snobs to contact me about the SSRP: yarnsnobs AT yahoo DOT com (you know how to make that look like an email address, right?). Yay, Snobs!